The considerably poorer performance per clock of BD means that I would rule out buying any 41XX or 61XX processors, and only compare the FM2 Athlons with Piledriver parts. Take a look at this comparison of an 8150 and an 8320: Despite the Piledriver part being 100MHz slower, it beats its predecessor in almost every single benchmark. These cores have noticeably lower performance per clock than the 63XX series which is based on Piledriver.
and the 4100 and AM3+ in general is to outdated.Ĭlick to expand.The 61XX series is based on Bulldozer.
So I would agree with most here that perhaps a cheap FM2+ board + the X4 is a very nice choice. we don't have any good data regarding the CPU performance gains from Kaveri (IGP is irrelevant for him I think), but something else to consider is, an adequate (great VRMs etc) MB for a 8 core FX also costs more. having the possibility to upgrade to a 3-4 module CPU would be nice, as would be the possibility of Kaveri, but.
as I said I think it would be around the same. in any case the 4100 is slower per clock, but the 750K is lower clocked. Click to expand.I'm not so sure, a few games show the benefit of extra cores and the 6300-8300 should be better (think Battlefield MP64 and this kind of game), as for the l3, the 4300 have 4MB of l3 cache (compared to 8MB from the 6300-83), and I'm not sure you can claim this difference (bottom of the page is gaming) is only because of that but.
0 kommentar(er)
